Comments on: fdrawcmd.sys license update http://simonowen.com/blog/2007/02/11/fdrawcmdsys-license-update/ Stuff and nonsense Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:30:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Peace http://simonowen.com/blog/2007/02/11/fdrawcmdsys-license-update/comment-page-1/#comment-276 Peace Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:30:20 +0000 http://blog.simonowen.com/2007/02/11/fdrawcmdsys-license-update/#comment-276 I only want to say thanks for your very well driver!!! Regards, Peace I only want to say thanks for your very well driver!!!

Regards, Peace

]]> By: Simon http://simonowen.com/blog/2007/02/11/fdrawcmdsys-license-update/comment-page-1/#comment-57 Simon Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:02:01 +0000 http://blog.simonowen.com/2007/02/11/fdrawcmdsys-license-update/#comment-57 GNU GPL seems like a better option for allowing 3rd party changes to be fed back into the main project. If I'm going to open it up, I'd prefer it to stay open for everyone - and BSD doesn't /require/ that. What makes you think BSD would be a better option? GNU GPL seems like a better option for allowing 3rd party changes to be fed back into the main project. If I’m going to open it up, I’d prefer it to stay open for everyone - and BSD doesn’t /require/ that.

What makes you think BSD would be a better option?

]]> By: Luchezar Georgiev http://simonowen.com/blog/2007/02/11/fdrawcmdsys-license-update/comment-page-1/#comment-17 Luchezar Georgiev Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:13:54 +0000 http://blog.simonowen.com/2007/02/11/fdrawcmdsys-license-update/#comment-17 Why exactly the GNU GPL? The "modified" BSD licence is much less restrictive and still GPL-compatible. Why exactly the GNU GPL? The “modified” BSD licence is much less restrictive and still GPL-compatible.

]]>